UotNS and how it screws with your head

Cliff Judge · 15 Jul 2010, 17:43 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: transentient at gmail.com (Cliff Judge)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:43:29 -0400
Subject: (urth) UotNS and how it screws with your head
In-Reply-To: <4C3E8714.7090203 at io.com>
References: <AANLkTinHy3Aec9OA-UHwh1uw3BFusrKErPLPID7aXss8 at mail.gmail.com>
	<E63D05FC598643369D658EB90F8BDE01@jill>
	<AANLkTikvoAFjIi4Aa5uxhbDgjXMdpKFA67WDFwOVwCxG at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C3C9385.9070502 at verizon.net>
	<AANLkTinfvtAt0h5X-tE9yW8Lh4s4jAq8VwPkHTJYgOP4 at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C3CA4A5.1040300 at verizon.net>
	<AANLkTikhC0kk09tuKSrZ3JSyWIaBr8wlCktA8u0Z4CPD at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C3E8714.7090203 at io.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinElXqJQqjf9mT6GVamqFryVb1qF2Uo8N-nh0cC at mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> wrote:

> On 7/13/2010 3:19 PM, Cliff Judge wrote:
>
>>
>> (I understand that the cosmological models most popular with physicists
>> these days involve a constant expansion until entopy has reached max,
>> but on the other hand, some recent papers have thrown credibility
>> towards the concept that black holes in our universe connect to white
>> holes in other universes, so Wolfe seems to be 1 for 1 here).
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by recent. The black hole/white hole thing still
> had some currency at the time of writing despite 1975's "discovery" and
> rapid acceptance of Hawking radiation allowing all of the black hole's
> matter-energy to eventually leak back into the same universe (for
> excessively long values of eventually) but as of 2005, the bulk of
> physicists including Hawking have held that that the information can return
> as well, though the only other black hole theorist of equal stature, Kip
> Thorne, remains unconvinced.
>

So what's this "dark flow" nonsense I have been hearing about in recent
months?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100715/fc4f5ac1/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net