Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Call 4 a FAQulty

Jason Voegele · 28 Jan 1999, 12:29 · from urth-v0023.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Jason Voegele <voegele.6 at osu.edu>
Subject: RE: (urth) Call 4 a FAQulty
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:29:19
Message-ID: <urth-v0023-0030 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0023/0030.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm a programmer, but I don't think it takes any programming skill=20
whatsoever if you use some of the search forms provided by standard search=20
engines.  HotBot, for example, provides a search form that you can embed=20
within your Web page, and all you have to do is provide the domain through=20
which it is supposed to search.  This would require a domain name=20
specifically for the faq (such as www.wolfe-faq.com), so it may not be=20
flexible enough.  It's worth looking into, though, and if it's not enough=20
feel free to contact me and I'll see what I can put together for searching=20
only those pages relating directly to the Wolfe FAQ.

Jason Voegele

-----Original Message-----
From:	Michael Straight [SMTP:straight at email.unc.edu]
Sent:	Thursday, January 28, 1999 11:33 AM
To:	urth at lists.best.com
Subject:	Re: (urth) Call 4 a FAQulty

On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, William H. Ansley wrote:

> I am not sure about the "less work" part; the archives are easily
> searchable as plain text (I have downloaded all of them except the most
> recent to my computer in this form) but because of inconsistencies in
> references (different abbreviations, referring to a character by a=20
nickname
> or by a humorously altered form of the name, simple typos, etc.) as well=20
as
> the shear bulk of the material over several different files, it is
> difficult to find specific information.

Still, I think it would be a big improvement if either:

1.  Someone with programing knowledge would help attach a search engine to
the archives (I have no idea how big a job that would be), or

2.  Each archive were available as a single large text file one could
search online with one's browser.

When I mentioned option #2 to Ranjit, it sounded like limited server space
at his site was the main obstacle.

As it is, I am regularly unable to find conversations in the archives when
I go back to try to find something someone wrote, largely because it takes
so long to search each of the archive volumes individually.

-Rostrum


works
*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/
ranjit at best.com
whorl at lists.best.com


*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net