Rudesind/Inire/Lunar Picture
David Stockhoff · 29 Jul 2010, 19:11
· from 2010-July.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:11:46 -0400 Subject: (urth) Rudesind/Inire/Lunar Picture In-Reply-To: <4C51CF1F.6020505 at io.com> References: <SNT123-W42864B026165A31352008FCFA70 at phx.gbl> <4C50CDC0.7080202 at verizon.net> <818476.35138.qm at web50708.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <4C51C6DB.3050607 at verizon.net> <4C51CF1F.6020505 at io.com> Message-ID: <4C51D272.4040405 at verizon.net> It is a poorly understood phenomenon, and I do not pretend to expertise on the subject. I seem to recall there was a bad movie about it once ... perhaps angels trade wings for genitals when that happens. Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/29/2010 1:22 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> I forget where Wolfe discusses it. I thought 2 of them spoke in blank >> verse. >> >> Either way, Wolfe puts much thought into his dialog: diction, >> vocabulary, rhythm, colloquialisms. His characters, as Shakespeare put >> it somewhere, "unfold themselves" through speech. By their speech ye may >> know them, every time. Except when they fake another's. >> >> We disagree on the meaning of >> >> "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with >> humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." >> >> This is like reading a metaphor comparing a woman's head to a mason's >> hammer as implying that her head is made of metal. Such a person has >> merely given up all his rights and powers as a cacogen; he has not >> actually chosen a new form. However, since the analogy seems to be to >> fallen angels, I guess the loss of wings meets both criteria without >> contradiction. > > How does that work? I don't see losing the wings would be equivalent > to gaining mortal flesh. >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net