Juturna, the Missing Sister

brunians at brunians.org · 01 Aug 2010, 06:28 · from 2010-July.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: brunians at brunians.org (brunians at brunians.org)
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 02:28:53 -0400
Subject: (urth) Juturna, the Missing Sister
In-Reply-To: <924139.11675.qm at web50701.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <SNT123-W31A23C4CE90783EED35F9CFA70 at phx.gbl>
	<ADFFCBFB-23A0-490F-B4EA-0534B85CAB40 at liftingfaces.com>
	<AANLkTikkC05XL0xQ-QbdhZPVjPbsUiCXsgVHiLYYP4gO at mail.gmail.com>
	<924139.11675.qm at web50701.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <d997b10709c2c7eb12eafa878dc457b1.squirrel at brunians.org>

> From: Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com>
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Ryan Dunn <ryan at liftingfaces.com>
>> wrote:

>>> is it definitely a catamite? or is that theoretical as well?

>> That's Severian's interpretation of what he sees. He could, I suppose,
>> be wrong...

> People keep saying this, but Severian tells us twice that he doubts the
> boy is a catamite.  At least so far.

He is trying to deny it because he likes Baldanders and would prefer not
to think of him as doing something as nasty as fucking a little boy.

.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net