Urth Net

← back to the conversation

BOTNS Comic preview

Dave Lebling · 09 Aug 2010, 22:59 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dlebling at hyraxes.com (Dave Lebling)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:59:22 -0400
Subject: (urth) BOTNS Comic preview
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinTizEWzLTx0BX9OiSyw_MTVifJJm_1tD8Zn9zH at mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C60682B.8000706 at io.com>
	<AANLkTinTizEWzLTx0BX9OiSyw_MTVifJJm_1tD8Zn9zH at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C60884A.7030802 at hyraxes.com>

Yes, it's bad. Let him read it through at least once on his own before 
getting all the answers (and the different versions of the answers) here.

The comic is pretty good (unlike Lane I rather like the artwork), and 
does less damage to the work than Peter Jackson did to Tolkien. Only 
three issues were published, alas.

-- Dave Lebling, aka vizcacha

Lane Haygood wrote:
> Is it bad that I want to log in to my little-used LJ account to post a
> link to the poor beleaugered soul in the comments, directing him/her
> to this list?  I mean, we may not be able to shed any actual light on
> the reader's confusion with the BOTNS, but at least we can offer up
> pages upon pages of interesting obfuscation.
>
> That said, not a terrible fan of the artwork, but I'd read it all the
> same, to see if the artists' visions match up to the one playing
> through my head when I read it.
>
> LH

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net