Vodalus & the Old Autarch

Ryan Dunn · 10 Aug 2010, 14:24 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: ryan at liftingfaces.com (Ryan Dunn)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:24:59 -0400
Subject: (urth) Vodalus & the Old Autarch
In-Reply-To: <4C613C6F.3070402 at verizon.net>
References: <AANLkTimH7=eNeHcti+wAWMy9Vt=-NVFNWsBoEm5NTO6- at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C613C6F.3070402 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <74839FE5-CE15-448A-8322-9A769A5C226C at liftingfaces.com>

On Aug 10, 2010, at 7:47 AM, David Stockhoff wrote:

> It is pretty odd that a ruler with his face on a coin would go about unannounced, letting people think he was merely a eunuch. Especially when he is rumored to be a eunuch.

I may have missed this, but is it definite that the face on the coin is the Old Autarch? I thought it was Tzdakiel for a while, probably because of the ship volant on the obverse side.

Just wondering if there's a passage that makes it clear whose face is on that coin.

...ryan

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net