Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Hierogrammates, Briah and Yesod

Gerry Quinn · 11 Aug 2010, 17:52 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:52:41 +0100
Subject: (urth) Hierogrammates, Briah and Yesod
References: <SNT123-W364CA387AD5923CDA7A9D4CF940 at phx.gbl><5812D15F-800B-4971-83D8-F829E9D0CC15 at liftingfaces.com><94C753843CC24501ACEFA3743D1C51E5@jill><922070.75966.qm at web37608.mail.mud.yahoo.com><AANLkTi=5=ZxGcfQVxci9ZBnmUjTZrZY-nASPixjeccbM at mail.gmail.com>
	<B44F8876-B2D2-482F-9377-61F4A3829BBB at liftingfaces.com>
Message-ID: <4F1E20DEA97841ECBAC4690958612BE3@jill>


From: "Ryan Dunn" <ryan at liftingfaces.com>
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 11:57 AM, Lane Haygood wrote:
>> I recall one short story that I am currently shopping out to various
>> publications.  During the reading/revision period, one of my
>> critiquers went on and on about the lovely allegory I was making.  Too
>> bad that it was entirely unintentional, but after considering her
>> comments next to the story, I had to agree that it appeared, for all
>> intents and purposes, as if I had intended to put a little allegory
>> there.
>>
>> Which is to say that, for a mind much more cunning and devious than my
>> own, I am sure Wolfe's subconscious often slips things in that he is
>> unaware of, as romantic of the notion of him as a master plotter
>> sitting alone in a candle-lit room, banging away at an old typewriter
>> and chuckling to himself about how he'll really get us with this next
>> one is.
>
> This undermines the impossible complexity, and intricacy of BotNS. It also 
> cheapens the literary impact of the > text as a whole, to chalk up a 
> series that has inspired over fifteen years of heated debate on a mailing 
> list, > don't you think?

I don't think so.  I reckon there are things discussed on this list whose 
origin is exactly as Lane suggests.  [I am not one for "+1" posts, but I 
think Lane's post here, and Craig Brewer's one shortly beforehand, are very 
good.]

>> I think, sure, there will be times where the reader react to something 
>> that Wolfe didn't intend to be pondered.

>He's said that himself. Something like "I'm surprised how much attention 
>readers give to some things, and how >little they give to others." 
>(regarding the popularity of BotNS). But he also says he wanted BotNS to 
>be, >unlike his other novels, something that would be studied well after he 
>was dead and gone.

I think he was being too modest there about his other novels - notably 
_Peace_ and _Fifth Head of Cerberus_, both of which preceded _BotNS_.

> That tells me that, coupled with his penchant for revision, and his 
> thorough enjoyment of rewriting, that Gene > took extra special care to 
> connect all of "his" dots in the text. I revised my original opinion that 
> he has an answer for everything in the book to state that every clue as he 
> saw them is a closed loop, with no holes in the hull of his ship so to 
> speak.
>
> I still believe that. You can sniff out when an author is just BS'ing his 
> way through something that is designed to appear heady, and those who have 
> a true mastery of their own subject matter to the point that they 
> themselves are driven crazy by the text's own eidetic quality.

I seem to recall he himself indicated, about the idea of cyclic universes in 
_BotNS_, that he was playing with the idea, but had no fixed interpretation 
one way or the other.

And I think an author can do that - perhaps even have a dominant 
interpreation of events, but still feel that an alternative interpretation 
is in some way valid.

- Gerry Quinn






An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net