Hierogrammates, Briah and Yesod
David Stockhoff · 13 Aug 2010, 02:01
· from 2010-August.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:01:37 -0400 Subject: (urth) Hierogrammates, Briah and Yesod In-Reply-To: <4C6481E0.7030401 at gmail.com> References: <921279.6662.qm at web84108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4C6481E0.7030401 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <4C64A781.4040003 at verizon.net> I don't know. Ant?nio Marques wrote: > > I don't think I'm confusing you, but I was under the impression you > agreed here. If not, what's your view of > > 1) Who created the Hieorgrammates? > 2) What's the 'multiverse structure'? > 3) Is Urth Earth? > >> Do you have any thoughts at all about why the Hieromakers were >> homologues rather than human beings, outside your interpretation of >> Tzadkiel's speech? > > Homologues to Severian's race. My guess is that if *we* work hard > enough, we'll be them. Not a matter of multiple futures; the fact that > we may eventually be them doesn't change that we'll have to have all > the hard work. > > As I said, I don't think strong conlusions can be had from the text or > interviews. I have only the other considerations and as I see it the > text kind of agrees with them. Urth just looks like an alternate > rather than the real Earth. > >> >> --- On *Thu, 8/12/10, Ant?nio Marques /<entonio at gmail.com>/* wrote: >> >> >> From: Ant?nio Marques <entonio at gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: (urth) Hierogrammates, Briah and Yesod >> To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> >> Date: Thursday, August 12, 2010, 4:28 PM >> >> DAVID STOCKHOFF wrote: >> > Right here, giving reasons ... >> >> Which are no more real than their contraries. >> >> > I agree that the homologue interpretation is valid. I don't >> see any >> > confirming reason for it outside an analysis of Tzadkiel's >> remarks. All >> > there is, is pushing the explanation farther and farther away: >> well, >> > there's ANOTHER universe with ANOTHER race, and THEY created >> YESOD, and ... >> >> Which actually is said in the text. Of course, the text may mean >> otherwise. >> >> You and Lee seem interested in not having more than two universes, >> Briah and Yesod. Others see little sense in that idea. >> >> Nor do I see where does youse 'Yesod is our universe' fit, unless >> it's a parallel interpretation. >> >> > I think that the homologue interpretation is unlikely and the >> identity >> > interpretation correct for the reasons I have given, and is >> supported >> > according to the reasons I have given. >> > >> > Imagine a ghost story that ends, "The ghost was ... MYSELF!" >> > >> > Now imagine one that ends, "The ghost was ... some guy I never >> met! Over >> > there ... somewhere." >> > >> > Which one does Wolfe pick, over and over? >> >> This seems to me to fit into the 'I like this architecture better >> than others so it is more likely' category. Certainly you're free to >> think that way, but you'll have to accept it doesn't necessarily >> constitute evidence for anyone else. I, for one, am simply trying to >> make sense of the text, not of what I think the text should or >> aspires to be. The fact that many people don't find your reading >> convincing doesn't preclude it, but indicates that it is neither >> universal nor obvious. >> _______________________________________________ >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net