Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Limited Good Choices

David Stockhoff · 13 Aug 2010, 15:29 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:29:55 -0400
Subject: (urth) Limited Good Choices
In-Reply-To: <4C64D135.4090507 at io.com>
References: <SNT123-W245B7B0B1B60AA09F1C2D9CF980 at phx.gbl>
	<4C64D135.4090507 at io.com>
Message-ID: <4C6564F3.7040709 at verizon.net>

Actually, omniscience is an ancient philosophical problem. God doesn't 
have the choice not to foresee everything. See Severinus Boethius' The 
Consolation of Philosophy.

Jeff Wilson wrote:
> On 8/12/2010 11:41 PM, Lee Berman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Nicholas Jost: If you look in the archive there was the assumption 
>>> in a post that
>>> as people moved "up" towards Yesod that choices would be limited.  
>>> Nothing in the
>>> text or Catholic theology supports such silliness.
>>
>> I am guessing this was my post you are referring to. It is based on 
>> the idea that
>> we humans feel we have choices because of the limits to our 
>> perception of the future.
>> We can only guess what will happen if we do something, so we feel we 
>> have choices.
>>
>> If we could see into the future we would be limited in our choices. 
>> We wouldn't
>> wonder what we should do because we'd know what we are about to do. 
>> An omniscient
>> being would have no choices whatsovever.
>
> I think this assertion has weak empirical and logical support. Humans 
> make poor choices even when they have reasonable knowledge of the 
> consequences, and there's no treatment of the idea that G-d may choose 
> not to foresee everything.
>
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net