Before and After

António Pedro Marques · 13 Aug 2010, 19:49 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:49:07 +0100
Subject: (urth) Before and After
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W5314749531A2837668C020CF980 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W5314749531A2837668C020CF980 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4C65A1B3.9090804 at gmail.com>

Lee Berman wrote (13-08-2010 20:43):

> I hope I can be forgiven for this heretical question...but if the
> Increate is born as the Theantropos in Briah (n+19), what is the
> situation with the Christ figure of Briah (n+20)? Is he better than
> Jesus? Or is Jesus perfect so all Briahs above (n+19) have the same
> Christ-figure?
>
> Or perhaps the perfection of Jesus requires that we are in the universe
> Briah (n+infinity)?
>
> I find these questions difficult. 		 	   		

I think any Incarnation will be equivalent, no matter the Briah it appears 
in. It's the rest of the Briah that may live to a higher or lower standard.

I don't think you need worry about the heretical thing. For a professed 
non-believer, you are impeccable in discussion religious hypotheses.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net