Urth Net

← back to the conversation

The Key to the Universe

James Wynn · 14 Aug 2010, 17:00 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 12:00:56 -0500
Subject: (urth) The Key to the Universe
In-Reply-To: <4C65FE27.20507 at io.com>
References: <SNT123-W18321445B4F9D92C8EA14BCF980 at phx.gbl>	<4C65AB94.5090503 at io.com>	<4C65BDDE.6060204 at gmail.com>	<4C65C9C3.5050708 at io.com>	<4C65D4B1.4020300 at gmail.com>
	<4C65FE27.20507 at io.com>
Message-ID: <4C66CBC8.7000009 at gmail.com>


>> James Wynn--assuming one lived in an environment where all life was
>> intelligently designed, questions about how an undefined intelligent
>> life might have arisen naturally in an some unknown environment would be
>> an entirely speculative question--beyond the realm of hard science. The
>> principles of engineering would be the best path for understanding
>> biology. Paleontology would be Architectural History.
>
> Jeff Wilson--I don't think this is necessarily the case, unless you 
> include the possibility of radically variant physical laws that would 
> prevent any kind of emergent, self-organizing behavior; a universe 
> without spiral galaxies or snowflakes. 

Well, lets assume that life on a planet was intelligently 
designed...that it was an artifice. And lets assume that after that 
moment and for 3 billion years following, although the life changed 
superficially over time, no new life developed there on its own--that 
all the life found there was a descendant of the originally ID life 
(this part is actually applicable to our planet). It would be reasonable 
to presume that studying the ID life would tell us nothing about life 
(intelligent or otherwise) that occurred by purely natural means. In 
fact, the planet would tell us nothing about the environment necessary 
for life to occur naturally.

u+16b9

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net