The Two Katharines

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 16 Aug 2010, 18:57 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:57:29 -0700
Subject: (urth) The Two Katharines
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W50DB164DDE20D6C2F9D97FCF9B0 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W50DB164DDE20D6C2F9D97FCF9B0 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=-VhpFGwrrEPriZa2qCA0Q5dkn+0dpR4iq5xTZ at mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Dan'l Danehy-Oakes- Nobody is surprised by a resurrection. Ergo, no resurrection takes place.
>
>
> Who has sugggested there was a resurrection? Not me, anyway. The only people I can see who are
> proposing a resurrection are those who are trying to argue against it.
>
> What is the term ...hay something....?

I think you're missing the point. If there's no resurrection, nobody dies.


-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net