The Two Katharines

Ryan Dunn · 16 Aug 2010, 19:25 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: ryan at liftingfaces.com (Ryan Dunn)
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:25:33 -0400
Subject: (urth) The Two Katharines
In-Reply-To: <4C698DD5.8090600 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W50DB164DDE20D6C2F9D97FCF9B0 at phx.gbl>	<AANLkTi=-VhpFGwrrEPriZa2qCA0Q5dkn+0dpR4iq5xTZ at mail.gmail.com>
	<B7B6D876-C754-4B7A-8CD9-E3ECC5710378 at liftingfaces.com>
	<4C698DD5.8090600 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <07A3D2C8-2C6C-4695-B53F-93C49B995D5B at liftingfaces.com>


On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:13 PM, James Wynn wrote:

> I can't look it up now, but someone said the sword was made of mahogany. That's not an especially light material. 


There is no mention of mahogany in any of the five volumes of BotNS. I have provided (as best as I can tell) all of the citations relating to the false sword in the post before this one.

...ryan

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net