Path of Air OFF-TOPIC

David Stockhoff · 21 Aug 2010, 01:01 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (David Stockhoff)
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:01:25 -0400
Subject: (urth) Path of Air OFF-TOPIC
In-Reply-To: <4C6F1E82.8070401 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W389CFBE3DA9A541A8D5A2CF9D0 at phx.gbl>	<4C6BE1D1.1060000 at gmail.com>	<4C6C7392.3080909 at verizon.net>	<AANLkTikk-Y4Hw==NnanL1XszKRcRWwTu-iAX=nqHdrhh at mail.gmail.com>	<4C6C8F24.1090909 at verizon.net>	<AANLkTikO9Lzz-VkhwmyqJ4F1Wcvx+w6TrTyNijNpnhoj at mail.gmail.com>	<4C6DC7CA.1040607 at verizon.net>	<4C6E4E30.2070905 at gmail.com>	<4C6E867F.4080209 at verizon.net>	<4C6E9465.5040702 at gmail.com>
	<4C6EDBC8.9050807 at verizon.net> <4C6F1E82.8070401 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C6F2565.4020206 at verizon.net>

Antonio

It is all too clear who is crying for attention. You are making public 
accusations that have no merit regarding a matter that you insist is 
private. You therefore leave me no choice but to respond here.

And my response is to ask you to cut the passive-aggressive psychodrama 
NOW. It is pathetic and shows your complete disrespect for members of 
this list.

This is the LAST you will hear from me.

David

Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've told David I wouldn't read any more personal e-mails from him for 
> the time being, as they were devoid of content (and actually abusive, 
> though my issue is chiefly with the pointlessness of it), but of 
> course I'd keep on reading his contributions to the list if he had 
> something to say there. I didn't for a moment think he was so much in 
> need of (my?) attention that he'd try to carry on our non-conversation 
> here. So, if it is my fault that a matter I took off-list returned to 
> it due to my not wishing to discuss it any more, I apologise. To avoid 
> further unpleasantness, I won't be reading David again for a while 
> either on- or off-list, so 1: if David wishes to keep talking, by all 
> means do, but I have nothing to do with that, and 2: if David should 
> regain his temper and wish this silliness to end, then say so via some 
> 3rd party. Sorry (honestly, not rhetorically) for wasting the 
> subscribers's time.
>
> And to David, my apologies for my part in the issue.
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 100820-1, 08/20/2010
> Tested on: 8/20/2010 8:33:00 PM
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net