Grand Unified Theory

Roy C. Lackey · 25 Aug 2010, 19:20 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: rclackey at stic.net (Roy C. Lackey)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:20:46 -0500
Subject: (urth) Grand Unified Theory
References: <SNT123-W15E8699921C55C8728319CCF840 at phx.gbl>
	<4C752BA3.5010103 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <004a01cb448a$a2851f40$a0ce4a0c@rclackey>

James Wynn wrote:
[snip]
> What I am saying is this. We know Silk is a clone-with-improvements.
[snip]

We do? I don't. All I know is that Silk came from a frozen embryo that had
been selectively modified for certain traits. The identities of the cell
donors is an open question.

-Roy

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net