Grand Unified Theory

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 25 Aug 2010, 20:48 · from 2010-August.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:48:08 -0700
Subject: (urth) Grand Unified Theory
In-Reply-To: <4C757DCE.5060709 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W15E8699921C55C8728319CCF840 at phx.gbl>
	<4C752BA3.5010103 at gmail.com> <4C753691.7090403 at gmail.com>
	<872020F6-A190-4874-BF1C-F24D984358A7 at liftingfaces.com>
	<AANLkTi=eHkP5AaApMqw+vm8feLGyQaN=v1symwW8cRav at mail.gmail.com>
	<4C757DCE.5060709 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=sDOmHo7yZeXVNnT24h9Fdyw+KA51F1Kwx3Zpw at mail.gmail.com>

Antonio,

I bow to your expertise in how words derive from one another; though I
find etymology endlessly fascinating I am far from expert in it. I
never meant to enter the argument about what was derived from which.

As regards pronunciation, though, for all I know the ancient Romans
may (though VERY improbably) have pronounced "crupta" as we pronounce
"blanko."

Given how much variation takes place in just the English of England,
and how much it shifts in a single lifetime, I find it hard to
conceive that we know how anything was pronounced two millenia before
the invention of recording technology. That Lat. "crupta" was very
similar to Gk. "krypth" I have no doubt, or that (say) Gk Beta was
more-or-less identical to Latin B. But how that B/Beta was pronounced?
Probably not too far from a modern "B", but I would be utterly
unsurprised to learn that it was, say, unvoiced, like a modern P. Can
we know how, say, koine was pronounced, or do we merely build edifices
of more-or-less probable speculations?

This may not be unrelated to my comment on grand unified theories
earlier this week, if only through my own innate skepticism.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net