Grand Unified Theory
Lee Berman · 28 Aug 2010, 13:53
· from 2010-August.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:53:02 -0400 Subject: (urth) Grand Unified Theory Message-ID: <SNT123-W85EDDB6571420D4975E72CF870 at phx.gbl> >Dave Tallman- I realize this is just a dream, but why did Mora become Hyacinth >rather than Fava? Why did Fava become Orpine? Well! I bumped into the dream sequence Dave partially posted last night and had the intention of starting a new thread on it but I was beaten to it! Actually I think this dream addresses another of James' theories (though to me they are all interrelated). In addition to the stuff about Scylla and Fava and Mora and Orpine and Hyacinth (and Vadsig's hair color) this dream mentions: >"the immense boles of the trees we passed and the monstrous, hairless beasts we >glimpsed showed that we were on Green, I knew (as one "knows" all such senseless >things in dreams) that we could never reach the sea unless I drove" First, I broadly agree with James. There is no such thing as "just a dream" in Wolfe's fiction. Unlike a real dream, product of one's irrational subconsious, Wolfean dreams are the product of a cunning, rational, very conscious intelligence. As such they can often be taken as more clear and understandable than what passes for the "real world" in a Wolfe story. The "monstrous hairless beasts" on Green may hint at James' other theory regarding the trees and vines of Green as Neighbors and Inhumi. So for James I think this dream might be a twofer one low, low price. For me the dream is all tied together to itself and to the other mysteries of the story. Like a certain painting in Rudesind's gallery. What seems to be a confusing collection of blobs of color will resolve itself into a recognizable picture if one will only step back far enough. This probably isn't very profound, but for me, what I see in Short Sun, is an ecological system which involves three species, humans, Neigbors and Inhumi and two planets, Blue and Green (or perhaps Urth is distantly involved too). The participants in this ecological system are all (now) conscious and intelligent which is unusual for an ecosystem. But the participants do not fully understand their roles (least of all humans). Identity and conscious-sharing confuse the picture greatly. There is, as in all ecosystems, competition and symbiosis between the species. Conflict and violence in the story can be a way of representing this. Why did Chenille (possessed by Mucor?) stab Orpine (whom the dream associates with Fava). I think we can step back and guess that this represents a conflict between human and inhumi. Why is there an initial animosity followed by an uneasy truce between Babbie and Seawrack on the boat? Perhaps it represents an endless competition/conflict between Neighbors and Inhumi, with a typically befuddled human (Horn and reader) on the sidelines wondering what the hell is going on. (I do think The Mother and Seawrack are derived/evolved from Inhumi as the shapeshifting and predatory nature remains true.) And so on for other issues in Short Sun. It works for me anyway. Just keeping a relatively simple, easy to underand GUT in mind helps me assemble the individual pieces which are so confusing and vague and nearly impossible to understand on their own.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net