Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Ozflash Revised, Part 1

Roy C. Lackey · 08 Mar 1999, 02:52 · from urth-v0024.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net>
Subject: (urth) Re: Ozflash Revised, Part 1
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 02:52:33
Message-ID: <urth-v0024-0048 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0024/0048.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3-8-99 "William H. Ansley" wrote:

>>This posting could be considered to be my way of volunteering to answer
the
FAQ: What are the Oz references in "The Eyeflash Miracles"? (for the second
time) except that I doubt it is a question asked very frequently. It is one
that interests me, however.<<

    Stop apologizing and get on with it! <g>

    I have never read the Oz stories (and am too old to start now), but I
still enjoy your commentary. I have seen the movie, of course, but that was
back in the '50s. Even so, I still knew there were obvious references to Oz
in _Eyeflash_. Heinlein did it too.

Roy




*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net