Grand Unified Theory

António Pedro Marques · 01 Sep 2010, 12:06 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:06:03 +0100
Subject: (urth) Grand Unified Theory
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimCd1oXFeKZigceXP-kS=xaU-nL7D=T=V0Vhz_u at mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimCd1oXFeKZigceXP-kS=xaU-nL7D=T=V0Vhz_u at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C7E41AB.5000209 at gmail.com>

Dave Tallman wrote (31-08-2010 19:06):
> I think we need to dig up the references in support of your Hyacinth
> theory at this point (...)

In James's defense, he said he needed some time to put it together and would
present it afterwards; since then, people haven't stopped asking him for
details and explanations. It's hardly surprising the picture we got is not 
that coherent.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net