The Pelerine (COTA 12)
Lee Berman · 10 Sep 2010, 03:09
· from 2010-September.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 23:09:23 -0400 Subject: (urth) The Pelerine (COTA 12) Message-ID: <SNT123-W45F0792A37AC5EC169E4DCCF740 at phx.gbl> >Andrew Mason >People comment from time to time on characters in BOTNS who aren't >named, although they seem significant enough to have names - e.g. the >Autarch or the old boatman. One I haven't seen discussed is the >Pelerine Severian talks with in COTA chapter 8. I think she is >particularly notable, because this part of the book is very carefully >structured. The odd chapters contain stories from Foila and co.: the >even chapters contain meetings of Severian with people connected with >the Pelerines. Three of them are named - Ava, Winnoc and Mannea - but >this one, even though the chapter is called after her, is just 'the >Pelerine'. Welcome Andrew! I think your observation of how the chapters alternate is good. I often think that chapter names provide more clues to what is going on than what is frequently acknowledged here. Especially good is your observation that, as much as we might obsess about names, sometimes the non-naming of a character can be a marker of significance. Why DO the other Pelerine characters get names but this one doesn't? I think this is Wolfe being especially devious. Which means that I don't really know what the significance is. All I have is a guess and some conjecture. When Severian is talking to Cyriaca, she first tells him that she has had no contact with any of the Pelerines since leaving. Later, under fear of torture, Cyriaca tells Severian that she got a letter a week ago from her friend, Einhildis, saying the Pelerines were stationed at the Autarch's battle camp at Orithiya. Being at Orithiya, and unnamed, I must guess this older Pelerine is Einhildis. I don't see anything mysterious about Einhildis herself. So my guess is that her un-naming is a pointer back to Cyriaca, telling us to pay careful attention to all she says and to read as much as possible into it, including omissions and deceptions. My conjectures about Cyriaca are: 1. She is a family member of Severian's, probably aunt. They have sex, so no great surprise there. Perhaps she is mother to Agia and Agilus as she plans to go to escape back to Nessus to sew and cook. 2. Her mysterious (and likely lecherous) uncle who told her so many stories and seems to know more about the cosmic history of humanity than anyone else on Urth might be Father Inire. 3. Severian's question to Cyriaca about whether the Pelerines dabble in necromancy is never answered, suggesting to me that they do. Meaning they are probably associated with the Witches. (I think the Citadel is mentioned to have a Red Tower and a Tower of Healing). We know that the Pelerines are primarily an exultant order. But we have evidence (secret beautification, khaibits, experiments with hairless creatures) that exultant Chatelaines also have some connection to witches. Secret connections all over the place. 4. Cyriaca discusses the landing of cacogens in the north and they they'd want to "avoid the mirrors at the House Absolute so they could escape the eyes of the Autarch." She discusses political tension between exultants and the Autarch, between the Autarch and the cacogens (hierodules). Stuff even Thecla knows only as rumor. Again, it seems Cyriaca's uncle has been filling her in on very secret stuff known only by the guys at the very top. Of course the cacogens do show up at the House Absolute for Dr. Talos' play, so Cyriaca isn't a perfectly reliable source of information. Still, I think the whole thing (along with Palaemon and Rudesind forgetting their lines) smacks of a big set-up for Severian. A play designed to set him on a particular course. Severian has been steered to Orithya. Master Ash observes that the Ascians mounting their current massive offensive can only be explained by one purpose: "your foes have need of an immediate victory and are straining every limb". I assume that need is related to the presence of Severian on the battlefield. I'm still not completely sure which parties are hoping he will be killed and which parties are hoping he will become Autarch and New Sun. Well, okay probably too much. As the old Autarch tells Severian, "you asked me for a light for your candle, and I tried to give you the sun...". But hopefully at least a little helpful.
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net