Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Short Sun blog review

António Pedro Marques · 22 Sep 2010, 17:27 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:27:14 +0100
Subject: (urth) Short Sun blog review
In-Reply-To: <4C9A39D8.600 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W5587D39E7937B08DEB2CF7CF7F0 at phx.gbl>	<4C98FDFC.7090908 at gmail.com>	<004b01cb5a09$51d7e520$64d24a0c@rclackey>	<4C9A1B01.2090003 at gmail.com>	<4C9A1EB8.2050508 at gmail.com>	<4C9A2469.4030209 at gmail.com>	<4C9A2FF3.1000403 at gmail.com>	<AANLkTikxgFp+=XnuA_OWR5p-ZY4eWNx0Ls=hL_gvU4OZ at mail.gmail.com>	<4C9A36E0.9080806 at gmail.com>
	<4C9A39D8.600 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4C9A3C72.8080701 at gmail.com>

James Wynn wrote (22-09-2010 18:16):
>
>>> Dan'l-
>>> That's a very modernistic/democratic approach ... people in feudal
>>> societies don't wonder where their taxes are going, they are grateful
>>> they aren't higher.
>>
>> Anotonio-
>> Don't know... taxes used to go to tangible things or waste. The Whorl
>> is not waste but isn't much tangible either. It's clearly something
>> that is visible - like, say, a cathedral - but unlike a cathedral, it
>> doesn't serve its purpose just by being there.
>
> As far as improving the life of any Urthling or colonist, it was surely
> a tremendous waste. As a monument it was merely tremendous, which is
> what one desires of a monument.

But a monument serves its purpose by being there. The Whorl wasn't meant to 
stay there.

> To repeat my analogy, the Pakistani and Iranian nuclear weapons programs
> will not improve the lives of any average citizen of those nations, nor
> have they so far. That is not why they are popular there (and they are).

And what popularity would they enjoy if they were sent to somewhere out of 
reach?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net