Urth Net

← back to the conversation

note Re: Short Sun blog

James Wynn · 27 Sep 2010, 21:35 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:35:33 -0500
Subject: (urth) note Re: Short Sun blog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikgU7y7LvxhBsgrAZxB7H74YsvJ8XePQ7u9JWZ+ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=vM3brntZRvgr717fgzT=fL-tGEjA4uBG+UqgE at mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikgU7y7LvxhBsgrAZxB7H74YsvJ8XePQ7u9JWZ+ at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CA10E25.5020208 at gmail.com>

  On 9/27/2010 2:51 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Nick Lee<starwaterstrain at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Also, this idea that aliens could be
>> non-carbon based is just wild theory. We have no idea what aliens would look
>> like, and in all likelihood they are carbon-based because that's easiest way
>> for life to arise.
> While it's true that 100% of the life forms we know are carbon based,
> we are looking at a very localized sample. We have no idea what
> chemical or other bases may actually produce life. Any physical
> structure which can replicate itself (just-slightly-imperfectly), and
> exists in an environment in which it can do so, is likely to become
> some sort of life.

Still there's presumably nothing to have prevented a non-carbon-based 
life form from having occurred on Earth along side a carbon-based 
version. On the other hand, even though the carbon-based version 
appeared on Earth --in geologic terms-- as soon as the planet was cool 
enough to do so, it only happened here once in 3.5 billion years. So 
maybe carbon isn't all that likely an element either.

~u+16b9

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net