Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Urth Digest, Vol 73, Issue 62

Andrew Mason · 28 Sep 2010, 13:58 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com (Andrew Mason)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:58:28 +0100
Subject: (urth) Urth Digest, Vol 73, Issue 62
In-Reply-To: <mailman.34736.1285639103.29658.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
References: <mailman.34736.1285639103.29658.urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=YVzbGK+mcXGQy5VhMLYKmy1fZAZuQB3kv6GRJ at mail.gmail.com>

Jeff Wilson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/26/2010 2:24 PM, Andrew Mason wrote:
?
>>
>> As I understand it, what properly distinguishes an autarch is that he
>> rules himself: that is why Ymar and his successors chose that title.
>> However, most people probably don't know that; having lived under an
>> autarch for a thousand years, they think of that as the normal term
>> for a ruler. Both Jonas (as Roy mentioned) and Cyriaca refer to
>> ancient rulers as autarchs, before pointing out that strictly speaking
>> this is wrong.
>
> This doesn't distinguish them from Typhon, who owes fealty to no one else.

As I understand it, 'rule himself' doesn't just mean 'owe fealty to no
one else', but 'control, discipline himself', 'not rule only in his
own interests', etc. But I'll have to check the passage to be sure of
that.

However, I don't think that matters to my original point. All I meant
is that Ymar and his successors called themselves autarchs, that
Typhon (and apparently earlier rulers) did not call themselves
autarchs, but monarchs, but that people in the Commonwealth sometimes
used 'autarch' for earlier rulers, because that was the term they were
used to. This can be so whether or not there is any principled basis
for the distinction.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net