Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Spring Wind

DAVID STOCKHOFF · 29 Sep 2010, 20:11 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: dstockhoff at verizon.net (DAVID STOCKHOFF)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: (urth) Spring Wind
In-Reply-To: <4CA395C9.70604 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <800755.51634.qm at web84107.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Good!?I was going to ask ...
I like the comparison of Horn to John Carter of Mars. But I only read the first book long ago and have forgotten it. Is there any direction the connection gives us?
Certainly Wolfe must have been in a Burroughs kind of mood for a while there, given all the six-legged creatures. Speaking of which, there is a movie version of?John Carter of Mars?due out in 2012.
And going on another tangent, I always think of the inhumi as a metaphor for what happens when a writer falls under the influence of another writer: if you read a lot of Melville while you are writing, don't be surprised if it ends up retaining some of the character of Melville.
And Wolfe himself enjoys imitation; he did a great Dunsany pastiche once. He is very conscious, if not self-conscious, of the process of literary digestion and re-creation. It's more than just reference---it's re-working.

--- On Wed, 9/29/10, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:

From: James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Spring Wind
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 3:38 PM


> James Wynn-
> I think we can safely say that the parts that are in the original myths/stories are absolutely historical.
Should be...
"I think we can safely say that the parts that are NOT in the original myths/stories are absolutely historical."
_______________________________________________
Urth Mailing List
To post, write urth at urth.net
Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20100929/08ce1bd6/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net