note Re Short Sun blog
Andrew Mason · 30 Sep 2010, 14:16
· from 2010-September.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com (Andrew Mason) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:16:15 +0100 Subject: (urth) note Re Short Sun blog Message-ID: <AANLkTin+VaEp+yO2UP7g4GLTk+BeCcxZw3-TozRq8wQR at mail.gmail.com> Lee Berman wrote: > >>Andrew Mason- ?It would be interesting to see Merryn's contribution to this discussion. > > Yes, if Dorcas and the Cumaean are included in the convesation. Quite so. My point, made less cryptically, is that these matters are debated withing the story, and they seem there to be treated largely as philosophical ones. Personally I have a lot of sympathy with Merryn. Whatever is, is part of nature. Vampires, for instance, do not exist (we think) in the world as we have it, but in a world where they did exist they would be natural beings - the laws of nature would be different. It is hard to work out a coherent definition of the supernatural which, on the one hand, does not reduce to 'inexplicable by _current_ science' (which would block new scientific discoveries) but which, on the other hand, draws a meaningful distinction between the natural and the supernatural. That said, there does seem to be something distinctive about Severian's powers. Hierodules, hierogrammates and sea-monsters have powers which _we_ cannot explain, but can be seen as part of the nature of the universe they live in. But Severian has powers which no one else has, so could be called 'supernatural'' in that a general account of the universe wouldn't include them. This is so, I think, whether or not he works by turning back time, and whether or not he works through biological processes - it's still true that what _starts_ those processes is not part of the ordinary order of nature. >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net