note Re: Short Sun blog

James Wynn · 30 Sep 2010, 16:48 · from 2010-September.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:48:52 -0500
Subject: (urth) note Re: Short Sun blog
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikbZnMGLqi7_KqDjp50EvB21S6OZBy8Yi0zH0F_ at mail.gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W555D2A473AB2A9B034642FCF670 at phx.gbl>	<4CA3F62A.90302 at io.com>
	<AANLkTikbZnMGLqi7_KqDjp50EvB21S6OZBy8Yi0zH0F_ at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CA4BF74.9080006 at gmail.com>


>> Considering even Jesus Christ Himself still had wounds visible to the
>> disciples after rising from death and a couple of days of decomposition, I'd
>> say your standards are a tad high.
> Dan'l-
> That's a little confusing - He seems to have had the wounds only when
> they were convenient. On a couple of occasions, people who knew Him
> well would not recognize Him after the resurrection, and you'd think
> the wounds would have been a dead giveaway.

Well, imprints from the nails in his wrists and ankles would not be 
readily apparent, I think. It could be that the ability to recognize him 
at all was the miracle...not the inability of the disciples to recognize 
him.

u+169b

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net