Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Thorny paradoxes

Tony Ellis · 30 Mar 1999, 10:36 · from urth-v0024.mbox · original

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: "Tony Ellis" <tony.ellis at futurenet.co.uk>
Subject: (urth) Thorny paradoxes
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 11:36:45 +0100
Message-ID: <urth-v0024-0103 at digest.urth.net>
X-Urthmirror-Source: http://www.urth.net/urth/archives/v0024/0103.shtml
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mathew Malthouse wrote:

> m.driussi at genie.com wrote:
>
> > Furthermore, the Norse word is spelled UR+, with the plus sign being
> > that wonderful letter which we no longer have in the Anglophonic
> > world--I won't bore you with the name of it.  It is necessary,
> > however falacious an impression it creates, to spell words with "+"
> > as having either "th" (which rudely approximates the phonetic value)
> > or "d" (which rudely captures the essence of the letter's shape,
> > since it looks like "a crossed d").
>
> Com'on, don't be shy. It's a thorn, yes? (The letter that printers used y=
 for,
> as in ye=3Dthe)

-That's- thorn, yes. But I wouldn't describe it as a crossed "d", more an a=
ngular
"P".

> Incidentally 'Urth', from very first seeing the word, put me in mind of '=
Ur-",
> as in, well I can't explicayte it to my satisfaction but as in Ur-gold and
> Ur-Viles.

Me too. But then the prefix "ur" is used to mean earliest, or most primitiv=
e, so
technically speaking we were right to do so. :-) I also used to wonder if t=
here
was supposed to be some suggestion of Ur, the ancient Chaldean city, which =
really
was way off the mark...

Roy wrote:

>     But that is precisely where the paradox occurs. That chapter, chapter
> XXXVII, is titled "The Book of the New Sun". The title implies, if anythi=
ng,
> that Canog is the author of _TBotNS_.

Well, it says on the back of my battered Arrow paperback that it is volume =
one of
"The Book of the New Sun", so isn't that TBotNS too?  I did carefully say '=
If you
can accept that Severian's narrative constitutes, either wholly or in part,=
 the
"lost" Book of the New Sun on which Dr Talos says his play is based'. If yo=
u don't
want to accept that, fair enough, I'm not entirely sure that I do. -But-, t=
here
does seem to be more than one Book of the New Sun. There's the one which the
imprisoned Thecla requests from her local lending library, which by definit=
ion
cannot be "lost", and there is the one Dr Talos's play is based on, which -=
is-
described as lost. There's at least one other reference to The Book of the =
New Sun
being lost, too.

>  Regardless of who put pen to paper when--Sev, Dr. Talos, Canog, or
> another--none of them originated the story.

Severian is an eye-witness. Where everyone else is writing second or third =
hand,
he's writing about events that he himself has taken part in. You can't get =
much
more original than that. Yes, he fudges the events of Urth's last day when
relating them to Canog, but later he puts this right by witnessing them fir=
st hand
and writing about them.

>     Which brings me to Dr. Talos again. He is several times mentioned as
> tinkering with the script of the play to accommodate his circumstances. W=
hen
> he does so is he changing history/destiny?

A fun idea, but I don't think so. In the play the Contessa sees a mysterious
figure, in UOTNS we learn that this is Severian, but he's not there because=
 he
read it in Dr Talos's play. He only makes the connection at that moment. Bu=
t he
will now write about this encounter. If his manuscript goes back in time, t=
his
argues that actual events drive the content of the play, rather than the co=
ntent
of the play driving events.


*More Wolfe info & archive of this list at http://www.urth.net/urth/




An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net