Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Typee, incidentally

Son of Witz · 12 Nov 2010, 18:48 · from 2010-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org (Son of Witz)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:48:32 -0800
Subject: (urth) Typee, incidentally
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W37A3B7FA98DDFED7E6F00FCF330 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W37A3B7FA98DDFED7E6F00FCF330 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <40AAB05F-ACD8-4C7B-AC96-02198ECF544E at butcherbaker.org>

On Nov 12, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
>> David Stockhoff: This solution, that missionary work is "just and holy" but missionaries 
>> are "earthly" and "productive of evil," is so reminiscent of one "solution" to the puzzle 
>> presented by the Hierodules, Vodalus, and the actions of the undines toward Severian---that 
>> even evil forces do the work of the Increate---that I think they must be related. In fact, the 
>> Heirodules on Urth from the perspective of a citizen of the Commonwealth must resemble an 
>> islander's view of missionaries, given the same level of knowledge and grasp of history.
> 
> At the end of CotA there is an elaborate blacksmith analogy made to describe the Hierogrammates' 
> shaping of humanity (below). I think it may be apt in describing how Wolfe's view of good and 
> evil doesn't follow the traditional Christian definitions. Humanity, as the hot piece of metal 
> being pounded, might define the solid, cool foundation of the anvil as being "good" and the 
> crushing, painful blows of the hammer to be "evil". But the blacksmith would not and could not 
> view the process this way. How could He accomplish His shaping by seeking always to elevate the 
> anvil and eliminate the hammer? 
> 
> Brings to mind the questions of why God created Lucifer et al. to fall and created Adam and Eve 
> to fail. Also that recently found Lost Gospel of Judas, which suggests Jesus and Judas secretly 
> planned the Judas betrayal all along to accomplish their spiritual goals.



Here lies one of the reasons why I'm always confused when people see Severian's ultimate act as a negative or satanic act.  Did they miss the point entirely?



_________________

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net