Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Nephilim

Andrew Mason · 28 Nov 2010, 17:57 · from 2010-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: andrew.mason53 at googlemail.com (Andrew Mason)
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:57:45 +0000
Subject: (urth) Nephilim
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=pH5-hsfLaD_sndY8QnS3ytUbfgNY6tx73r_7R at mail.gmail.com>

Jerry Friedman wrote:

> Another possibly amusing connection is that if Genesis 6:4 is part of the story
> of Noah, it appears to say that at least some of the Nephilim survived the flood
> (apparently stated explicitly in the apocryphal _Book of Jubilees_). ?Now who do
> we know that can live under water?

I would read it as saying that more Nephilim were produced after the
flood. - which would be odd if the Nephilim were the cause of the
flood. (Thers no doubt, though, that this interpretation - that their
fathers were fallen angels, and that they produced the corruption that
led to the flood - goes back a long way, being found in the book of
Enoch, which at least in its original form is pre-Christian.)
>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net