Urth Net

← back to the conversation

god(s) and gods

James Wynn · 29 Nov 2010, 19:46 · from 2010-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:46:03 -0600
Subject: (urth) god(s) and gods
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W258B0AF627213FA19D715CCF240 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W258B0AF627213FA19D715CCF240 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4CF402FB.2010207 at gmail.com>

On 11/28/2010 9:36 PM,  wrote:
> Lee Berman-
> The origin of the name Pas is certainly a thorn in my side. The text hints that it is related
> to the god Pan, though I suspect Wolfe knows Pan's name has more of a connection to the word
> "panic" than the prefix for "all". Pan's name may have a connection to "pastoral" and that is
> the source of the name of Pas. But I also note the connection between Typhon and his Persian
> cognate Pazuzu. "Pas" could be short for that nasty wind god/demon. But I think I'm alone in
> that guess.  Even James Wynn and his attraction to the wind aspect of Typhon doesn't share my
> interest in Pazuzu here.

I _do_ like the connection between Pas and Pazuzu. I mean, it works so 
sweetly as a connection between Pas and Typhon.
BUT I find the connection between Pas and Pan so compelling that I find 
it hard to believe he would not have settled on that name even if the 
name were not at hand. The association with "pas" and "dog" seems likely 
to be compelling to Wolfe on many levels and adds depth to an analogy 
that --to my mind-- needed it.

ON THE OTHER HAND, while Pazuzu nice, it's not as solid as I have come 
to expect Wolfe's puns. It's like associating "inhuma" with "inhuman". 
It's is there, and it is convenient association. But it's not the 
primary way Wolfe plays with words. So I don't think it could have been 
more than an afterthought. It would not surprise me if Wolfe noted the 
association, though.

u+16b9

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net