Padding?

Mo Holkar · 30 Nov 2010, 11:16 · from 2010-November.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: lists at ukg.co.uk (Mo Holkar)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 11:16:20 +0000
Subject: (urth) Padding?
Message-ID: <451456.67501.qm at smtp817.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

Hi all,

One of Wolfe's comments in the Cooney interview, 
linked here recently, caught my eye. Re BotNS:

"If you look in the third book, you will find a 
storytelling contest that?s strictly padding. 
That contest got me a really good review in 
Playboy Magazine ? and I?ve always been grateful to it for that reason."

I have always seen the storytelling contest as 
narratively and thematically important. We step 
back from the main action, and get a succession 
of insights into the metaphysics of the 
characters' world. We then read on with somewhat renewed eyes.

I guess we can continue to believe that Wolfe is 
being a little disingenuous when he says it's 
"strictly" padding. But it is slightly sobering 
to reflect that if BotNS had remained a trilogy, 
it wouldn't have been included.

Although perhaps you may feel that this is post 
hoc reasoning, and really it is indeed padding 
that we could have done happily without?

best wishes,

Mo

# ~ # ~ #

WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe
http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net