Who's Right?

António Pedro Marques · 01 Dec 2010, 21:53 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:53:52 +0000
Subject: (urth) Who's Right?
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W4850036C247BBF2002B80CF260 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W4850036C247BBF2002B80CF260 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4CF6C3F0.8090509 at gmail.com>

Lee Berman wrote (01-12-2010 18:51):

> There are others who take a similar view of my Inire theory (still a
> work in progress) but I am confused as to why it might provoke such
> rancor (...)

Might I repeat that it's some of your methods that irk some, rather than the
content of your theories?

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net