Academic commentary
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 01 Dec 2010, 22:36
· from 2010-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:36:45 -0800 Subject: (urth) Academic commentary In-Reply-To: <4CF6CB90.6020506 at gmail.com> References: <AANLkTim+D2sh3vfCaG2hPJu6zmvQbWnZvfjKxOxfeJCt at mail.gmail.com> <4CF6CB90.6020506 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <AANLkTi=kxLCKdYcNVOmWyPYMUAVJc4JZU=ipyWK=6937 at mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:26 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote: > Since you have been up-front that you haven't read Wright I think it would a > drastic mis-reading to think you are arguing anything but pure theory.? But > delving into Marxism is only useful for reading Jameson in the sense that > understanding his arguments requires understanding the premises of Marxism. > But I hardly think it is necessary to understand atheism in order to > understand Wright's arguments. Marxism does not only inform Jameson's arguments; it constrains that conclusions he is able to reach, and to read him usefully (and especially to read him against other, non-Marxist critics discussing the same works) requires understanding not only the arguments but the constraints. He is (okay: _seems_) incapable of constructing an argument or reaching a conclusion which is inconsistent with Marxism. Is it possible that such a constraint operates in Wright's case? -- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net