Academic commentary
António Pedro Marques · 02 Dec 2010, 16:53
· from 2010-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:53:45 +0000 Subject: (urth) Academic commentary In-Reply-To: <178E24A5-F794-431A-98B7-64E15953B256 at liftingfaces.com> References: <AANLkTik74RnPrKVV00FOv3zNF5D9PJBdVTTcsf35=jzG at mail.gmail.com> <178E24A5-F794-431A-98B7-64E15953B256 at liftingfaces.com> Message-ID: <4CF7CF19.1060808 at gmail.com> Hi Ryann, Ryan Dunn wrote (02-12-2010 15:34): > The least heartening thing about this whole conversation is that Wright > has been deemed wrong or (worse) incapable of comprehending certain > spiritual motivations of Wolfe's text strictly because he is reading it > from an atheist's perspective. Who's done that? I haven't seen it. I have seen people say that a strict atheist perspective precludes a full analysis of the work. That's quite a diferent thing. (I don't even think it is so myself; I see many so-called atheists unwilling to follow certain lines of reasoning, just as one used to see so-called religious people unwilling to follow others, but I don't see that a given (ir)religious framework absolutely stunts the analysis of any given work. As I said in response to Lee, one may even argue that there is no God in NS - since we're talking about NS - but one has to go through all the hoops first to be convincing, unless one is, as it were, preaching to the choir.) (Whose was that old story in which an atheist managed to become Pope?)
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net