Who's Right?

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 03 Dec 2010, 18:30 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:30:05 -0800
Subject: (urth) Who's Right?
In-Reply-To: <4CF9357C.1020009 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W4850036C247BBF2002B80CF260 at phx.gbl>
	<DCF427ABA9624F4294F000AEFC3CADAE@jill>
	<AA42864B-F518-43D5-A066-DDB78AFEC791 at liftingfaces.com>
	<AANLkTi=7iCMpVQsnoCpqeFvBV4c=cXqUtA5WN6PaCxhE at mail.gmail.com>
	<2CA4EC37-5B3E-4371-A2DE-190F99D7D545 at butcherbaker.org>
	<4CF9357C.1020009 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTinVqspAZ==HAJmGXpGvSqP20BSR9SuocGxdQUdv at mail.gmail.com>

Son of Witz wrote (03-12-2010 18:04):
> Well, at the end of citadel Severian says that he knows Inire was with him
> in the north, so we assume that we saw him and that Inire was the Uturuncu.

Ummm ... This could simply mean that Inire was in the north at the
same time as Severian, could it not? And why would we assume that he
was the Uturuncu?

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net