Who's Right?

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes · 03 Dec 2010, 18:33 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: danldo at gmail.com (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:33:13 -0800
Subject: (urth) Who's Right?
In-Reply-To: <4CF9370F.9040602 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W3525940047FE88828CC45ECF280 at phx.gbl>
	<4CF9370F.9040602 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=_Dgngfcs7dj_2A564WQGfMn8MDHisWYWaAWAW at mail.gmail.com>

2010/12/3 Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>:

> For all I know, what's special about the man Jesus are his teachings. That's
> the key element I find missing from the 'Conciliator'.

Actually, there's nothing terribly revolutionary about Jesus'
teachings, though they were unusual coming from a Second Temple Jew.
Either he was the Son of God or he was nobody important.

-- 
Dan'l Danehy-Oakes

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net