Who's Right?

António Pedro Marques · 03 Dec 2010, 21:26 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio_Pedro_Marques?=)
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:26:15 +0000
Subject: (urth) Who's Right?
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W645BF0D2F7F0A74591211ACF280 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W645BF0D2F7F0A74591211ACF280 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <4CF96077.4000008 at gmail.com>

Lee Berman wrote:
> auctorial

Can anyone explian to me when to use this and when to use 'authorial'?
Thanks.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net