Urth Net

← back to the conversation

Dionysus

James Wynn · 06 Dec 2010, 22:07 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:07:58 -0600
Subject: (urth) Dionysus
In-Reply-To: <4CFD5478.6010802 at gmail.com>
References: <SNT123-W12FF99F0FE7CE0B037804ECF2B0 at phx.gbl>
	<4CFD5478.6010802 at gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CFD5EBE.3060205 at gmail.com>


>> James Wynn-
>> You might as well ask why it is legitimate for merely human Horn to 
>> to cut
>> a deal with the Neighbors on behalf of the whole human race. The 
>> answer is,
>> it wouldn't be.
>>
>
> Gerry Quinn-
> Not for humans.  My assumption here was that the Neighbours have 
> different customs related to such agreements; perhaps they are more 
> communally-minded than humans.

So...the deal-making was farce? The Rajan (who really just Silk after 
all) will go on to the Whorl and Neighbors will soon discover that their 
bargain is not worth the paper it wasn't written on?

>> James Wynn-
>> HORN, the resurrected Horn, is the only being in the universe that is 
>> 100%
>> human and 100% Neighbor.
>>
>
> Gerry Quinn-
> If your theory is true, he seems to me more like the Manchurian 
> Candidate in this regard!

I seem to be having a problem clarifying homoneius. Still, I'll try to 
get the rest of my response out tonight, and hopefully it will be 
clearer. Although, I'm sensing that you're reading them only to come up 
with quick objections and reponses chosen for their supposed wit rather 
than than insightful understanding.

>> James Wynn-
>> He's much more of a legitimate CHRIST-figure.
>
> Gerry Quinn-
> He's some kind of mystical figure all right, although I don't recall 
> any incidents from the Gospels in which Jesus lured 
> troops onto minefields, or raised vampires as terror weapons.  (Seems 
> more like a bit of old Pas coming out to me.)

You read the part where I said "Not equivalent to Christ as Aslan is" 
right?
I don't see much Pas-like in saving a town from tyranny.
Still, not everything in the New Testament is "gentle Jesus meek and mild".

> Gerry Quinn-
> Also, he continues to worship the Outsider - how does that fit in?

It works just fine for Arminianist theology. And, in fact, it is not 
ignored in Augustinian Trinitarian doctrine either.
/"I keep asking that _the God of our Lord Jesus Christ_ , the Father of 
glory, may give to you a spirit of wisdom and of revelation in the 
knowledge of Him." _Ephesians 1:17/

And he is a Christ figure on multiple levels. As three-persons-in-one, 
he is a picture of God Himself.

u+16b9

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20101206/82b4334f/attachment.htm>

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net