Father Inire Theory cont.

António Pedro Marques · 10 Dec 2010, 19:13 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 19:13:49 +0000
Subject: (urth) Father Inire Theory cont.
In-Reply-To: <4D027A01.4020408 at verizon.net>
References: <SNT123-W164D73548CC2BCEE8BABFBCF2F0 at phx.gbl>
	<4D027A01.4020408 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <4D027BED.8080806 at gmail.com>

David Stockhoff wrote (10-12-2010 19:05):

> Inire is everywhere a vizier needs to be. But he isn't everywhere, he
> isn't truly evil,

For the current pop culture, influencing = evil.

> and he isn't rebelling against anything. I agree that
> he takes a certain "fallen," or at least grounded, angel position like
> that between Pope and God, but if he is the personification of evil,
> what is Erebus?

Maybe I should have asked wheteher it was
FI + Autarchy + Vodalus + Erebus
God + City of God + City of Man + Devil
?

Seeing as in fact the interests of the Devil have nothing in common with 
those of evil humans, except inasmuch as the latter are his tools.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net