Father Inire Theory cont.

Lee Berman · 10 Dec 2010, 19:55 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:55:37 -0500
Subject: (urth) Father Inire Theory cont.
Message-ID: <SNT123-W57E292C86750DF3EA2F620CF2F0 at phx.gbl>

Okay, have to answer that question. I see Erebus and Abaia as not so distinct as their
naming might indicate. The end of RttW suggests Scylla and Abaia are not so separate
either. They are (by design by Wolfe) difficult to delineate and understand.

As Antonio suggests, they work through agents. It must be considered that Father Inire
is merely one of those agents. He doesn't have to be everywhere or a shapeshifter if a
larger entity is breaking off pieces to serve as agents. He is just, ironically, the most 
visible face of them with regard to wielding political power. There are other jobs to do.

In our history, we can cast the evil vizier whispering into the king's ear, be it Rasputin, 
Adolph Eichman or Dick Cheney, as a demonic metaphor. But I think it is a SF-Fantasy 
(and horror?) author's stock-in-trade to take our historical, mythological and relgious 
metaphors and create "real" characters out of them. I think Gene Wolfe has done that.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net