Father Inire Theory cont.

António Pedro Marques · 11 Dec 2010, 00:36 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: entonio at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?B?QW50w7NuaW8gUGVkcm8gTWFycXVlcw==?=)
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:36:17 +0000
Subject: (urth) Father Inire Theory cont.
In-Reply-To: <4D029831.5020601 at verizon.net>
References: <SNT123-W39F07BCA558003A074CC3ACF2F0 at phx.gbl>
	<4D029831.5020601 at verizon.net>
Message-ID: <4D02C781.6030003 at gmail.com>

David Stockhoff wrote (10-12-2010 21:14):

> On 12/10/2010 4:04 PM, Lee Berman wrote:
>
>> I think (in BotNS) when a portion of Tzadkiel truly falls and becomes
>> separated from angelic grace (and leaves the ship for good) we can tell
>> because it becomes ugly. Hence Hethor, Inire and The Cumaean.
>
> The Cumaean is a possibility for fallenness, but then who is she? Is she
>  also the Devil? Is she Inire?

I've been waiting for an opportunity to ask the following:

"- What the hell is the purpose of the Cumaean."


Now isn't it beautiful when everybody follows time-hallowed quoting conventions.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net