Father Inire Theory cont.

Lee Berman · 11 Dec 2010, 22:27 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:27:40 -0500
Subject: (urth) Father Inire Theory cont.
Message-ID: <SNT123-W210CB8AA3BCBD4067AD4CCF100 at phx.gbl>

>Andrew Mason: It seems to me, though, that this runs together two different things.
>There is the literal/symbolic distinction; these can exist together; a
>candle can both be just a light source (literally) and have some Satanic significance 
>(symbolically). And there is the distinction between two literal meanings, surface and 
>hidden; and these, I feel, are not compatible; Severian cannot both be a virgin and have
>homoerotic experience.

This was an important enough response that I thought it needed its own entry. I will respond
by saying you are wrong. Severian CAN be both a virgin and non-virgin. The reason is because
he is not a material being. His substance is a product of text and mental images. Since the
main text suggests he is a virgin and the sub-text suggests he is not, we can have two 
contradictory mental images formed. Which is right? That's the point. Neither or both!

I am not engaging in silly sophistry. I believe Wolfe writes with the exact principles I just
outlined in mind. There is a need for the ability to maintain simultaneous, contradictory 
visions to understand Gene Wolfe's work. (especially when it comes to Yesod ;- ))

Why? Because that is the only way you can understand God. God who is of the Spirit and the opposite
of material things yet who created all that we see.  How else can you understand an entity who is 
simultaneously the source of all good and all evil. The one who created Heaven and allowed
Hell to be created. Who gave strict orders to Adam and Eve then provided irresistable temptation.

I hope this makes sense.  I asked Gerry Quinn if he believed in God for this reason. If he does
there may be a chance he can understand this. If he is an unredeemable materialist I must imagine
him saying, "no, God can't be 100% good and 100% evil; that is impossible; is he is then he can't exist".

*****

On a slightly less serious note, I've known girls who are both virgins and non-virgins, using the
1 year abstinence rule to regain virgin status. One actually can find validity in this if we accept
that in creating our own self image we operate as a Creator and simulataneous contradictory truths
are possible. In fact I will go out on a limb and suggest that if you are unable to grasp contradictory 
truths, you are incapable of understanding God, Gene Wolfe and women ;- ).

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net