christ, again

Son of Witz · 15 Dec 2010, 21:05 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org (Son of Witz)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:05:32 -0800
Subject: (urth) christ, again
In-Reply-To: <SNT123-W38C3B57CC49BA575A57070CF140 at phx.gbl>
References: <SNT123-W38C3B57CC49BA575A57070CF140 at phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <DF7608AC-DF95-4A8A-8172-AC0980D6213A at butcherbaker.org>

On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Lee Berman <severiansola at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
>> Son o' Witz: But even without going that far, the only way you can deny Christ in Briah is 
>> if you deny that the Outsider is a real diety.
> 
> Sorry, I'm not knowledgable enough to discuss the Logos stuff. Maybe I can later.
> 
> But in saying we must deny The Outsider as a real deity it would seem you are saying that we
> must deny Dionysus as a real deity. I'm not sure Gene Wolfe does. 
> 
> What do you think regarding this?                         
> 

No, no.
I think that if you say there is no Christ in Briah, then you deny that the Outsider is a real deity, which I think is a mistake.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net