Urth Net

← back to the conversation

(no subject)

Son of Witz · 16 Dec 2010, 00:15 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: Sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org (Son of Witz)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:15:36 -0800
Subject: (urth) (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <254238.95661.qm at web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <B7D2542A-8A0E-4F19-BF81-F80EAFB9F571 at butcherbaker.org>
	<590010.75633.qm at web84108.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
	<AANLkTimcMTGQ5HM3o2b9_SyqzFD-T-gPdHk8bENwBaQx at mail.gmail.com>
	<4D094DE2.5030407 at verizon.net>
	<BC9543A9-03FF-47BB-BD37-0A5E0AAC69A6 at butcherbaker.org>
	<254238.95661.qm at web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <C111C806-B539-486A-B494-621BAE52E7C2 at butcherbaker.org>



No, I am not saying that BotNS is not fiction. Not at all.
I'm saying that I think Wolfe mashed up a lot of his beliefs which might seem to a simpler mind to be incompatible, and he inserted a Christ-like redeemer into it.  I'm saying that the metaphors probably DO go far to explain Wolfe's feelings about the universe though, but it is all done within a fictional metaphor.  I don't think he is doing it lightly, or simply mashing ideas for the heck of it though.

On Dec 15, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Craig Brewer <cnbrewer at yahoo.com> wrote:

> So, Witz, are you saying that, fundamentally, you don't think that BotNS is 
> fiction? I mean, sure the story's made up, but are you saying that you find 
> BotNS to actually be a working-out of an actual theory-of-the-world/cosmos?
> 
> I ask because that seems to be a point that comes up among fans of Wolfe a lot 
> of times. (Hi, there, brunians, if you're still listening.) It seems like 
> there's definitely a tendency among some Wolfe readers to see him working out a 
> *real* cosmology at some level rather than just writing speculative fiction. 
> (Maybe David's PKD/Valis reference was prescient on this point, speaking of a 
> dude who believed his own sci-f...uh...SF. heh) It's just very different from 
> how I read him: writing speculative fictions that play with different, even 
> contradictory ideas, rather than developing a consistent cosmology.
> 
> I would be curious if you could find that interview quote. I recall a number of 
> times where Wolfe has mentioned in interviews that the world is stranger than we 
> might think, but I haven't actually seen a place where he crosses the line of 
> saying "this aspect of 'genre' writing/thinking is just plain realism." It 
> usually seems to me that he's much more cagey about such issues in a way that 
> leaves possibilities open rather than explicitly stating his belief in a set of 
> particular ideas. (Even in interviews where he talks about his religion, he'll 
> say things like "I'm Catholic, but that may not mean what you think it means.")
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Son of Witz <Sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org>
> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
> Sent: Wed, December 15, 2010 5:44:19 PM
> Subject: Re: (urth) (no subject)
> 
> 
> 
> Why create a fictional universe if it is fundamentally the same as our own?
> Well, are you sure that our universe is cyclically recreated in the same pattern 
> again and again?
> Are you sure that we shaped a race of beings that in turn shapes us?
> I'm not sure, but I think it's probably true.
> 
> Anyway, I don't have the quote, but somewhere Wolfe said something to the idea 
> that he wrote New Sun to explore the ramifications of his beliefs.
> Personally, I think he attempted to reconcile his convert-Catholic belief in 
> Christ with his beliefs in other worlds, ideas about cyclicality of reality and 
> temporal causality, belief in powers higher than humanity, his revolt against 
> the modern world, and perhaps a belief that extra terrestrials helped shape 
> humanity, along with a hope that our fallen creation can be saved, even if it 
> means another flood to wipe out corrupt humanity.  Just guessing, but that seems 
> very much like what he's given us.
> ~Witz
> 
> On Dec 15, 2010, at 3:23 PM, David Stockhoff <dstockhoff at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
>> Yes, exactly. I meant "sci-fi," with the scare quotes.
>> 
>> Do you prefer "sf"?
>> 
>> The question is the same. Why create a "cyclical iterations of the same 
>> creation that keeps playing out in more or less the same pattern" fictional 
>> universe if it's fundamentally the same as ours?
>> 
>> On 12/15/2010 4:50 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:46 PM, DAVID STOCKHOFF <dstockhoff at verizon.net 
>>> <mailto:dstockhoff at verizon.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>   I mean "similar," i.e., identical except for key differences. That
>>>   is, in the usual sci-fi sense that most people understand.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> H'mmm. Well, I would have said that the usual science-fictional sense of 
>>> "parallel universes" includes the idea that they are in some sense moving along 
>>> in time next to ours. The "mirror universe" in Star Trek is a classic example.
>>> 
>>> Also, please refrain (note that I am asking politely) from using the term 
>>> "sci-fi." Some find it very offensive.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Dan'l Danehy-Oakes
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
>> Virus Database (VPS): 101215-1, 12/15/2010
>> Tested on: 12/15/2010 6:23:14 PM
>> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 AVAST Software.
>> http://www.avast.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net