christ, already

Craig Brewer · 16 Dec 2010, 00:45 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: cnbrewer at yahoo.com (Craig Brewer)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:45:01 -0600
Subject: (urth) christ, already
Message-ID: <0or4smslv76r1cy7qba05drx.1292460301704 at email.android.com>

So I get all the sacrifice stuff and redemption, etc.

But why is that aspect of God also identified as the Logos/Word?

Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com> wrote:

>> Just curious, then: if the Logos was eternal, why did it have to enter
>> history
>> in the form of an actual living man?
>
>He was to be the final sacrifice; no one can top sacrificing God. This
>Ultimate Sacrifice paid the blood price for all sins committed and yet to
>be committed by generations yet unborn, completing the older quid pro
>quo-style covenants and making way for the new covenant of forgiveness,
>and a personal relationship with God.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
>Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net