Sci-Fi

Gerry Quinn · 16 Dec 2010, 17:44 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:44:18 -0000
Subject: (urth) Sci-Fi
References: <B7D2542A-8A0E-4F19-BF81-F80EAFB9F571 at butcherbaker.org><590010.75633.qm at web84108.mail.mud.yahoo.com><AANLkTimcMTGQ5HM3o2b9_SyqzFD-T-gPdHk8bENwBaQx at mail.gmail.com><2824B484-6B51-46ED-80B8-28C3F2DC2D2A at butcherbaker.org>
	<AANLkTi=hhFz-_OeZeizNMNzFk+20F7G8n8Bzu5a50G3c at mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C579C543C4614FB3AF08CE312CECDEFD@jill>


From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com>

> "Sci-Fi" is the sound of two crickets screwing.
>
> More seriously: "Sci-Fi" is a term made up by a publicity hack, in
> analogy with the then-popular "Hi-Fi" for "high fidelity" stereo
> equipment. It referred, and in many SF fans' minds still refers, to
> movies about giant insects devouring Cleveland and suchlike. "Sci-fi"
> is, in short, _bad_ science fiction.

Or, more precisely, sciemce fiction as described by those with no idea of 
what is good or bad science fiction.  I think I would have subscribed to 
that concept in the past, but I feel that the term 'sci-fi' has lost a good 
deal of its pejorative force over the past couple of decades.  So while I 
would use 'SF', 'Sci-Fi' no longer bothers me much.

- Gerry Quinn

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net