(no subject)
Gerry Quinn · 16 Dec 2010, 18:36
· from 2010-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: gerryq at indigo.ie (Gerry Quinn) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:36:48 -0000 Subject: (urth) (no subject) References: <SNT123-W16D08B9FE0ACA25CE25D62CF140 at phx.gbl><4D35F4794AE94278BA718E442C77D355@jill> <4D0A45DC.80902 at verizon.net> Message-ID: <9584549FDDAE461C89DC49B5A1F65AA7@jill> From: "David Stockhoff" <dstockhoff at verizon.net> > Why is it a great leap? To start with, because to assume something not mentioned in a text must therefore not exist in the universe of that text is a leap. > Either other paths of salvation exist, or they do not. I have never heard > of any such, except that many have commented that heathens may attain > grace and thus be considered eligible. Generally, Christians speak of > "Salvation through Jesus Christ Our Lord amen etc." You have not heard of any... except insofar as you have! > But the Son came here for the express purpose of salvation. If he doesn't > show up, then all we are left with is grace---and Severian seems to attain > some version of that. > > No leap at all. The existence of grace implies the non-existence of salvation? - Gerry Quinn > On 12/16/2010 11:14 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: >> >>> The "similar history" is explained by the same principle as the similar >>> (but not identical) >>> geography of Urth to our Earth. Wolfe says he conceives of Briah as a >>> different universe than ours, >>> a previous iteration. >>> >>> I think it is more accurate to say Long Sun has religious references to >>> a Jesus-like character. >>> Nothing about salvation is mentioned, that I know of. >> >> I agree that this aspect of Christian doctrine is not mentioned, but the >> obvious reason is that Wolfe's cosmogony is complex enough without it! >> Also, I think it plausible that Wolfe believes salvation might be >> attained by means other than the Incarnation, particularly in a >> hypothethical universe where Jesus did not exist. So I don't see the >> necessity for making great interpretational leaps just because it is not >> mentioned. > > > --- > avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. > Virus Database (VPS): 101216-0, 12/16/2010 > Tested on: 12/16/2010 12:01:16 PM > avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 AVAST Software. > http://www.avast.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Urth Mailing List > To post, write urth at urth.net > Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net >
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net