Urth Net

← back to the conversation

jungle hut jesus

Lee Berman · 18 Dec 2010, 21:44 · from 2010-December.txt.gz

This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site, so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.

From: severiansola at hotmail.com (Lee Berman)
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:44:02 -0500
Subject: (urth) jungle hut jesus
Message-ID: <SNT123-w105B1C67BF6FC81AC06E20CF170 at phx.gbl>



>Marc Aramini: >One more point, all this talk of an "unknown" christ in Severian's 
> Universe just seems wrong, wrong, very wrong.  Even though Severian 
> was later conflated with the Conciliator, those early descriptions of 
> the Conciliator are so Christlike as to be absurd, and the jungle hut 
> with those missionaries seems like, you know, such an obvious 
> reference not to a Conciliator but to a Christian missionary system, 
> in our universe.

 
>David Stockhoff: That's exactly what it is: an obvious reference not to a Conciliator but 
>to a Christian missionary system, in our universe.
 
Christian missionaries who have been put on display at a zoo and rendered somewhat ridiculous
in their speech and behavior.
 
I think this is an example of starting with a conclusion and then finding the evidence which 
supports it. Not excluding myself from the process. If the conclusion is that our Jesus is present
in BotNS, the ambiguous evidence will be seen as supporting it.
 
Once my conclusion that this is a gnostic, non-Christ universe hit me, all the evidence for the
existence of Jesus Christ seemed turned to the opposite; evidence against him in this universe.
 
For me, we have BotNS Flood but it isn't our Flood. We have a BotNS Typhon but he isn't our Typhon.
My default assumption becomes that the BotNS Jesus isn't our Jesus. Might have gotten buried,
but earlier I built an argument for how the "scourger" in the Long Sun legend could refer to Severian.
 
I think we must all admit that our chosen conclusion shapes how we see the evidence. 		 	   		  

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net