Gene Wolfe is for Socialists
António Marques · 20 Dec 2010, 03:02
· from 2010-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: entonio at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ant=F3nio_Marques?=) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:02:21 +0000 Subject: (urth) Gene Wolfe is for Socialists In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=AUDuXrCSiSoFtk0tH1YOggD57+KNdGBf+h6eQ at mail.gmail.com> References: <4D0A90E8.7010006 at gmail.com> <000501cb9f58$21bb1bc0$65315340$@net.au> <COL105-W18A266C8E7DB54A9969E7885180 at phx.gbl> <AANLkTi=AUDuXrCSiSoFtk0tH1YOggD57+KNdGBf+h6eQ at mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <AANLkTing0uhqUtCswGEPq7RTSb0g6gaA8QkVYBSfAKrw at mail.gmail.com> On 20 December 2010 02:23, Matthew Knight <jacobeiserman at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm with Pedro on this one.? I think the list's author is finding something > of value in 5HOC when viewed through a socialist lens, despite recognizing > vast differences between Wolfe's perspective and his own.? Here's my own > sweeping generalization that is likely logically unprovable: most good art > can be appreciated from a variety of angles, insofar as the art reflects > something true about life and the angles from which the art is viewed are > able to discern some kind of truth, even if distorted. I don't know about others, but I enjoy reading people whose ideas are completely at odds with mine, provided they are well developed. (Of course, there is a world of difference between well developed and simply hypertrophied.)
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net