Fish and Caves
James Wynn · 22 Dec 2010, 16:55
· from 2010-December.txt.gz
This is the message as the crawl holds it, before anything
here touched it. What the conversation shows has been through ingest: transfer
encodings decoded, attachments dropped, quote markers repaired, and the
archiver’s ? resolved into quotation marks and dashes. Those
repairs are judgements and some of them are wrong, which is what this page is
for. Email addresses are obscured here as they are everywhere else on the site,
so it is before our repairs rather than byte for byte.
From: crushtv at gmail.com (James Wynn) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:55:31 -0600 Subject: (urth) Fish and Caves In-Reply-To: <4D12280E.8000902 at gmail.com> References: <303847.43646.qm at web58204.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <4D121BBA.30608 at gmail.com> <4D1222CB.5080800 at gmail.com> <4D12280E.8000902 at gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D122D83.2090309 at gmail.com> >>> Ant?nio Pedro Marques- >>> I just don't see any compelling evidence that dream travel is across >>> time. If it were, shouldn't the trip with Rigoglio be to the time he >>> left Urth? >> >> James Wynn- >> Really? So Silk seeing an astral flying Oreb in his room while the >> current Oreb is lame downstairs doesn't give you pause? > > > Ant?nio Pedro Marques- > It would if it were established that Silk saw an astral flying Oreb in > his room. Okay. What could possibly establish that for you? Oreb adamantly affirms that it wasn't him. His twin? His father? > >> James Wynn- >> Incanto and Oreb >> in the grandmother's tale from her youth on the Whorl doesn't seem >> suspicious? > > Ant?nio Pedro Marques- > Suspicious but not definitive. How about an alternate theory? > >> The screwy timeline in the Book of the Short Sun (Sinews >> kids age not really matching, the times since Horn, Hoof, and Hide not >> matching), that doesn't make you think astral travel is temporal? > > Ant?nio Pedro Marques- > Not really. It's not like the incoherences in the narrative are > limited to the timeline. > All those can be evidence, but they're not compelling evidence. There > may be better evidence that I've missed. So, you're answer is "We can't explain everything in the books, so the obvious problems with time-line are not really indicative of temporal disjuncture." Once again. I don't know what sort of confirmation would put you over the edge. >> James Wynn- >> Mucor takes hours to reach the Whorl by >> astral travel. Travel with the Rajan is instanteous. I suspect is Wolfe >> recognizes an ability for Time travel in order to accomplish this. > > So it would take ages for them to reach Urth, but the time is cut > short by time-travel, of which they are unaware, and yet they end up > on Urth at what is generally considered the present time? Time travel > that exactly compensates such a great offset, only to deposit them at > the present time, instead of at a point that would make more sense for > Rigoglio? (NB this applies whether one thinks the time they land on is > the present time or something else, as long as it's not close to the > time of Rigoglio's lifetime there.) I'm not sure what you are getting at. It seems you are defining how things would work if /you/ wrote the books. Wormhole travel is typically defined as simultaneous temporal and space travel (I only recently heard a physicist explain it) --thus the traveler arrives instantaneously at his new location as though he walked through a door without violating Relativity. The point is that the Rajan's travels to Green and to the Whorl are unhinged from the Time-line and consequently Rigoglio's travels to Urth should be assumed to be as well. We have two examples of Time-travel by the Rajan and Oreb. We have a book with a serious time-line issue. There is no evidence to the contrary that the Rajan doesn't Time-travel. In a book with lots of mysteries, it's nice to have one mystery that is so resolvable. u+16b9
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net